Medicare-for-All wouldn’t be Medicare if it eliminated private insurance

Should Medicare-for-All replace private insurance?

 The question is central to health reform debates among Democratic presidential candidates, but it presents a fundamental contradiction. If Medicare-for-All were to eliminate private coverage, it wouldn’t truly be Medicare as we know it, which has made room for private insurers from the start.

Read more

Philadelphia’s City Council could have fought opioids by placing limits on pharma reps

Does over-prescribing of opioids lie at the heart of the addiction crisis? Some members of Philadelphia City Council along with many public health experts think so. Last week, a bill came before City Council to limit the activities of pharmaceutical sales representatives, also known as detailers, who promote prescription drugs to physicians.

Read more

The Texas ACA ruling is an assault on logic

 ACA opponents have a new approach to attacking the law – incoherence. 

On Friday, a federal judge in Texas accepted the argument of 20 Republican attorney generals that the ACA’s mandate requiring everyone to have insurance is unconstitutional because the tax penalty enforcing it has been repealed. In other words, he struck it down because it no longer has any practical effect. Logic was in for a rough ride in this decision.

Read more